Skip to content
CERRE think tank Logo
  • About us
    • About CERRE
    • Our team
    • Board of Directors
    • Careers
    • Transparency & Independence
    • FAQs
  • Areas of expertise
    • Energy, Mobility & Sustainability
    • Tech, Media, and Telecommunications
    • Cross-sector
  • Publications
    • Ambitions for EU 2024 – 2029
    • Global Governance for the Digital Ecosystems
  • Events
    • Upcoming events
    • Past events
  • Blogposts
  • Insights
  • Media Room
    • Press Releases
    • Press Coverage
  • Membership
    • Our members
    • Become a member
  • Contact
  • About us
    • About CERRE
    • Our team
    • Board of Directors
    • Careers
    • Transparency & Independence
    • FAQs
  • Areas of expertise
    • Energy, Mobility & Sustainability
    • Tech, Media, and Telecommunications
    • Cross-sector
  • Publications
    • Ambitions for EU 2024 – 2029
    • Global Governance for the Digital Ecosystems
  • Events
    • Upcoming events
    • Past events
  • Blogposts
  • Insights
  • Media Room
    • Press Releases
    • Press Coverage
  • Membership
    • Our members
    • Become a member
  • Contact
Filter by Sectors





News & Insights
#Tech, Media, Telecom

Director General Bruno Liebhaberg addresses the IIEA expert panel on the Digital Transformation and Consumer Vulnerability

  • 14 July 2022

On Thursday 14 July, CERRE Director General Bruno Liebhaberg, addressed the expert panel “The Digital Transformation: Addressing Consumer Vulnerability” organised by the Institute of International & European Affairs.

Read his full speaker intervention* here below.


While the digital transformation is introducing improvements to business-to-consumer practices, consumers are now having to deal with ever more complex choice environments, where firms can optimise these choice environments for their own ends. One of the biggest challenges for consumers in a data-driven environment is digital asymmetry, that is the power imbalance in the markets between consumers and data-empowered traders. Digital asymmetry has three dimensions:

  1. Architectural/structural, rooted in control of the choice architecture of the service and access to data (and the related difficulty of verifying compliant use of data in the supply chain);
  2. Relational, since the bargaining power of the consumer, is low – they may either accept or leave, with very limited alternatives;
  3. Knowledge-based, as the trader benefits from detailed insights about the consumer while the consumer often knows (or understands) very little of how the trader and the service operate.

Therefore, when we think about the drivers of digital regulation, the first thing which comes to mind is the realisation that markets don’t self-correct and the second one is that platforms may not self-regulate. But there is a significant third driver: even if markets function well, they will not do so for everyone and a quite large number of people, of consumers, will remain vulnerable.

Initially, one thought that vulnerable consumers were a small sub-set of population with identifiable characteristics. The challenge was to find them and target interventions to protect them and/or help them make better choices whilst allowing the rest of population to continue to engage freely with markets.

The big questions were (and still are):

  • Whether you can make markets work better for vulnerable customers (eg by getting them more engaged or informed) or whether you accept that the market is unimprovable and then have measures to protect vulnerable customers from its worst effects?
  • How many of us are actually vulnerable, and in what circumstances (because context is often important) ?
  • How to preserve the benefits of the market whilst intervening ?

We are still at a relative early stage in understanding all this. My colleague Professor Amelia Fletcher, a CERRE Research Fellow and also a non-exec director of the British Financial Conduct Authority and of the CMA, is a leading thinker working on these questions.

Now focusing again on consumer vulnerability in digital, I note a number of issues:

The first one is digital exclusion and inability of people to access markets at all – because for instance of lack of broadband connection or unwillingness to engage at all. This means that vulnerable people remain trapped in the (more costly/less efficient/ perhaps less diverse) analogue world. Similarly, digital illiteracy is an issue and when I mention it, you immediately realise that the children are not the only category which is vulnerable. A vast majority of elderly people is concerned as well.

The second issue is that once people can access markets, we realise, as I hinted at one minute ago, that we are ALL vulnerable to the effects of choice architecture which firms employ to distort our decision-making processes. Our conception of what vulnerability is and who is vulnerable is therefore likely to change. Potentially quite radically…

Thirdly, digital gives us more choices than before, but that does not mean consumers will necessarily be better off if the choices are illusory or can be manipulated

Lastly, some people react to digital content differently from others, or we react differently in different contexts. Again, how do we protect those that are vulnerable and could be harmed, whilst retaining the free flow of information for the rest?

The DSA and DMA are both directed at these issues. The DMA’s focus on ‘fairness’ in terms of the terms of trade between digital platforms and consumers, including vulnerable consumers, is a hook for further action.

The DMA and DSA complement a series of other initiatives launched by the European Commission within the framework of their New Consumer Agenda 2020. The latter recognised that new technologies and data-driven practices may limit the effectiveness of the current rules designed to protect consumers in the digital environment. It also stressed the need to ensure equal fairness online and offline. The Commission has launched last May a new targeted Fitness Check of EU consumer law.  Focussing on Digital Fairness, the Fitness Check will look among others at consumer vulnerabilities, dark patterns (i.e. deceptive design patterns, tricks used in websites and apps that make you do things that you didn’t mean to, like buying or signing up for something), personalisation practices, influencer marketing, contract cancellations, subscription service contracts, marketing of virtual items and the addictive use of digital products, etc.

Three short final points on implementation and enforcement of the new rules:

Implementation of these rules will require from regulators new expertise around technical issues such as A/B testing and algorithmic decision-making, to understand, anticipate, and remedy the myriad of ways that, in the online economy, consumers can be put at a disadvantage. The potential is there for regulators to use the same techniques to assess measures to protect consumers or influence how they make choices, And we note that regulators are beginning to acquire resources and organise themselves to do this – DG Comp is considering a CTO and say that the DMA will lead to a significant recruitment of new digital expertise.

Secondly, whatever upgrade regulators grant to their structures and processes, effective implementation will require from them a very close co-operation with the platforms.

And finally, regarding enforcement: should it be centralised (as provided for in DMA/DSA) or current system in EU consumer law (consumption country coordination)? hopefully not origin country coordination such as GDPR because, as demonstrated by experience, this would provide a very limited incentive to efficiency.


*With special thanks to CERRE colleagues Richard Feasey, Alexandre de Streel, Amelia Fletcher and Sally Broughton Micova for their suggestions and references.

Author(s)
Loading...
Bruno Liebhaberg (Website)
Bruno Liebhaberg
Executive Chairman¹ ²

Bruno Liebhaberg is Executive Chairman of the think tank Centre on Regulation in Europe (CERRE) which he founded in 2010.

From 2018 to 2021, he was also the first Chairman of the European Union Observatory on the Online Platform Economy. He is also an Honorary Professor at the Université Libre de Bruxelles’ Solvay Brussels School of Economics and Management (SBS-EM ULB) where he taught from 1979 to 2018. Earlier in his career, he advised former European Commission President Jacques Delors on industry and R&D matters related to the completion of the EU Single Market.

He holds a Master’s in management sciences from SBS-EM ULB and a Ph.D. in Industrial Relations from the London School of Economics and Political Science.

¹Also representing B.LIEBHABERG S.A., Director General
²Member of the Strategic Committee

Bruno Liebhaberg is Executive Chairman of the think tank Centre on Regulation in Europe (CERRE) which he founded in 2010.

From 2018 to 2021, he was also the first Chairman of the European Union Observatory on the Online Platform Economy. He is also an Honorary Professor at the Université Libre de Bruxelles’ Solvay Brussels School of Economics and Management (SBS-EM ULB) where he taught from 1979 to 2018. Earlier in his career, he advised former European Commission President Jacques Delors on industry and R&D matters related to the completion of the EU Single Market.

He holds a Master’s in management sciences from SBS-EM ULB and a Ph.D. in Industrial Relations from the London School of Economics and Political Science.

¹Also representing B.LIEBHABERG S.A., Director General
²Member of the Strategic Committee

More news

on #Tech, Media, Telecom

Zach Meyers Discusses EU Tech Regulation on BS-TBS Japan

13/05/2025

Zach Meyers quoted in Euractiv on transatlantic impact of Google antitrust case

02/05/2025

Alexandre de Streel Featured in Tech Policy Press on EU Digital Regulation Trends

24/04/2025

CERRE Academic Co-Director on DW News on First DMA Fines

24/04/2025

CERRE’s Director of Research Featured in Politico on Digital Markets Act Enforcement

24/04/2025

Zach Meyers Featured in Reuters on EU Tech Regulation

23/04/2025

CERRE: Let’s learn from a first year of experience, improve the DMA implementation process, and ensure effective child protection under the DSA.

28/03/2025

Alexandre de Streel on EU Tech Regulation in Challenges

05/03/2025

Director of Research Zach Meyers on the EU’s Trade Strategy in The Parliament Magazine

27/02/2025

CERRE Director of Research Quoted on VAT in U.S. Trade Debate

21/02/2025

Stay informed

Subscribe to our newsletter for our latest updates

Subscribe now

Centre on Regulation in Europe asbl (CERRE)

Avenue Louise, 475 (box 10)
1050 Brussels, Belgium
T.: +32 2 230 83 60
E-mail: info@cerre.eu  

Linkedin-in Youtube Link
  • Copyright CERRE 2010-2023
  • BE 0824446055 RPM Bruxelles
About
  • About Us
  • Team
  • Board of Directors
  • Annual review
  • Careers
  • Transparency & Independence
  • FAQs
Expertise
  • Energy, Mobility & Sustainability
  • Tech, Media, Telecom
  • Cross-sector
More
  • Publications
  • Events
  • Blogposts
  • Insights
  • Privacy & Legals
  • Cookie Policy

Centre on Regulation in Europe asbl (CERRE)

Avenue Louise, 475 (box 10)
B-1050 Brussels – Belgium
T.: +3222308360
E-mail: info@cerre.eu 

BE 0824446055 RPM Bruxelles

Linkedin-in Youtube
About
  • About Us
  • Team
  • Board of directors
  • Annual review
  • Careers
  • Transparency & Independence
  • FAQs
Expertise
  • Energy & Sustainability
  • Tech, Media, Telecom
  • Mobility
  • Cross-sector
More
  • Publications
  • Events
  • News & insights
  • Our members
  • Become a member

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience.

OK
CERRE Privacy Policy